|
|
||
|
Planning Board Minutes
October 9, 2002
Board members present:
Hedy Bennett, Chair Frank
Holbrook, Town Solicitor
Colleen Aull Ron
Wolanski, Town Planner
David Lawrence
Audrey Rearick
Arthur Weber
John Tucker
Skyler Mills
The meeting was called to order at 7:10 pm.
Minutes of September 11, 2002
Motion by Ms.
Rearick, seconded by Mr. Weber to approve the minutes of the
September 11, 2002 Planning Board meeting. Vote: 7-0-0
Sitting as Planning Board
Old Business
1. LaCroix
– Tuckerman Ave. – Mike Hill- Plat 116NE, Lot 134
2-lot subdivision (Final )
Mike Hill represented the applicant. The
required zoning relief has been granted by the Zoning Board of
Review. Mr. Hill explained that the work to remove the second
dwelling from the two-family dwelling as required by the
Planning Board has not been completed. He requested that the
Board grant final approval subject to the work being completed
prior to recording of the plat. The Board agreed that the work
must be completed prior to recording.
Motion by Mr.
Weber, seconded by Ms. Rearick to approve the final plan with
the condition that, prior to recording, the applicant must
convert the existing two-family dwelling on the property to a
single-family dwelling, so that there will be one single-family
dwelling on each of the subdivision lots. Documentation from
the Building/Zoning Official must be provided to the Town
Planner to confirm that the required work has been completed.
Vote: 7-0-0
2. Northup
– Forest Ave. – Plat 112, Lot 40 3-lot
subdivision (Final)
Attorney David Potts, representing the
applicant, indicated that the Zoning Board of Review had
granted the required frontage variance but the decision had not
yet been recorded. Mr. Potts also stated that the Town Engineer
had not reviewed the revised plans but that most of the
comments regarding the previous plan had been addressed. Mr.
Dupont, the applicant’s engineer, questioned the need for
drainage calculations. Mr. Potts requested that the Board
approve the final plan subject to the engineering issues being
resolved with the Town Engineer.
Mr. Wolanski stated that the Town Engineer
has requested that the Planning Board not conditionally approve
plans where engineering issues are unresolved.
Motion by Mr.
Tucker, seconded by Ms. Rearick, to continued the application
to the November 13, 2002 Planning Board meeting. Vote: 7-0-0
3. Saltwood Farm
– Peter and Elizabeth Gallipeau – Plat 126, Lot 4,
4-lot subdivision (preliminary)
The Board discussed with Mr. Gallipeau the
issue of the sewer moratorium. There appeared to be a
discrepancy between the guidance that was given to the Planning
Board by the Town Council at a Sept. 23rd meeting
and an amendment to the moratorium currently under
consideration by the Council. The issue involves the need for
new lots to have frontage on the sewer main, which would impact
the proposed subdivision. The Board expressed their desire to
continue the matter until Town Council resolves the apparent
discrepancy.
Mr. Gallipeau requested that the
subdivision be considered for preliminary and final approval at
the November meeting. The Board denied the request stating that
at this time there are other issues, including provision of
fire protection, which must be resolved prior to final
approval.
Motion by Ms.
Rearick, seconded by Mr. Mills, to continue the application to
the November 13th Planning Board meeting. Vote: 7-0-0
4. Discussion
– Proposed Shopping Center Definition Zoning Amendment
Mr. Wolanski presented a draft amendment to
create two classes of shopping center in the Zoning Ordinance.
A memo providing the comments of Roland Chase, Assistant
Solicitor, was provided. The memo included recommendations to
revise the proposal prior to forwarding it to the Town Council.
Motion by Ms.
Rearick, seconded by Mr. Tucker, to amend the draft as
recommended and forward the revised draft to the Town Council
for consideration. Vote: 7-0-0
New Business
5. Kempenaar
– Valley Rd./East Main Rd. - Plat 107SE, Lot 107,
2-lot subdivision (preliminary)
Attorney Pat Hayes, Jr., representing the
applicant, requested that the Board continue this application
to the November meeting.
Motion by Mr.
Tucker, seconded by Ms. Aull to continue the application to the
November 13th meeting. Vote: 7-0-0
6. Segerson
– Greene Lane - Plat 105, Lot 4B & 4C, 5-lot
subdivision (preliminary)
The applicant was represented by Attorney,
David Martland. The Board expressed concern with the proposed
sewer connection in light of the ongoing discussion of the
sewer moratorium and how it relates to new subdivision lots.
The Board will continue the item until the moratorium issue is
resolved.
Motion by Ms.
Rearick, seconded by Mr. Mills, to continue the application to
the November 13th Planning Board meeting. Vote: 7-0-0
7. Silviera-
Peckham Lane – Plat 128, Lot 7, 74, 74C 3-lot subdivision
(preliminary-final)
The applicant was represented by Attorney
Pat Hayes, Jr. Mr. Hayes explained that the plan creates no new
building lots, but adjusts the property boundaries to be
consistent with ongoing uses, including a nursery school.
Currently a property line bisects the parking lot for the
school. This plan will result in the areas associated with the
school being on the same lot. The plat results in the reduction
of frontage on lot 7 making it nonconforming. The applicant has
been granted the required variance by the Zoning Board of
Review.
Motion by Ms.
Rearick, seconded by Mr. Lawrence to grant preliminary and
final approval of the plan. Vote: 7-0-0.
8. Waite/Galvin
– Oliphant Lane & Jepson Lane - Plat 111, Lot
44D, 2-lot subdivision (preliminary)
The applicant was represented by Attorney
David Martland. The Planning Board established a subcommittee
to review the application and report back to the full Board.
The subcommittee will include Ms. Aull, Mr. Lawrence, and Ms.
Rearick, and will meet at the site on Friday October 18, 2002
at 8:00am. Ms. Aull will chair the subcommittee.
9. Barker
– 117 Paradise Ave. - Plat 120, Lot 69,
Watershed Protection District Advisory Opinion to the Zoning
Board of Review.
Ms. Bennett, stating that she is an abutter
to the subject property, recused herself from discussion of
this item. Mr. Tucker acted as Planning Board Chairman for this
item. The Board established a technical subcommittee to review
this item. The subcommittee will include Ms. Rearick, Mr.
Weber, and Mr. Lawrence, and will meet at the site on Thursday
October 17th at 8:30am. Ms. Rearick will chair the
subcommittee.
10. Draft
Comprehensive Plan
Mr. Tucker presented the Board with the
draft five-year update of the Comprehensive Community Plan. The
Board thanked Mr. Tucker and the other members of the
Comprehensive Plan Update Advisory Committee for their efforts
in completing the update. The Board set a workshop with the
Comprehensive Plan Update Committee for Wednesday, October 23rd at 6pm.
A Public Hearing will be held on Wednesday, October 30th at
6pm in the Council Chambers.
The Planning Board adjourned and convened
as the Town Center Review Board
Old Business
1. NF
Autocenter, Inc. – One Mile Corner LLC, 310 West Main
Rd., Plat 108NW, Lot 163, 168, 196
Applicant not present. Item continued to
the November 13, 2002 Planning Board Meeting.
2. RK Associates
– Middletown Associates, LLC 288 East Main Rd, Plat 113,
Lot 15-A
The applicant was represented by Pat Hayes,
Jr. The applicant requested approval of a new wall sign for the
Bed Bath & Beyond store and a wall sign for a storefront
created as a result of the reduction of the size of the Bed
Bath & Beyond store. There would be no addition to the
pylon sign for the new store. The applicant offered two
alternatives. The first included wall signs for each store that
would be in compliance with the area requirements. The second
included a wall sign with area that would result in the Bed
Bath & Beyond store exceeding its allowed signage area. The
wall sign for the new storefront would be less that what is
allowed in the Zoning Ordinance.
The Board reviewed and discussed the merits
of both alternatives. The Board decided that the applicant must
be required to conform with the area requirements of the
ordinance in order to avoid setting a precedent that could
affect future enforcement of the regulations.
The applicant requested that the Board
waive the requirement for materials to allow the signs to be
constructed with opaque plastic letters. The letters will be
back-lit or “halo” lit consistent with the
Marshall’s sign currently in place on the building.
The applicant also requested approval of
the new storefront to include glass doors and windows
consistent with the other storefronts in the shopping center.
Motion by Mr.
Mills, seconded by Ms. Rearick to approve the application for
wall signage for the Bed Bath & Beyond store and the new
storefront consistent with Exhibit A as presented, provided
that the signs are back-lit and comply with area requirements,
and provided that the sign for the new storefront is limited to
two-feet in height. In approving the application the Board
waives the requirements of section 2404.5(g) to allow
construction using plastic letters. Vote 7-0-0
Motion by Mr.
Weber, seconded by Mr. Lawrence to approve the installation of
the new storefront consistent with the storefronts in the
shopping center. Vote: 7-0-0.
Following the decisions on the signs and
the storefront, Mr. Hayes stated that RK Associates is
interested in purchasing an adjacent property (AP 133, Lot 17)
for an undetermined future use.
3. Aquidneck
Plaza – Starbucks – 99 East Main Road Plat 107SE,
Lot 106
The applicant, represented by Attorney
David Martland, requested the Board’s approval to alter a
previously approved plan. The change would alter the East Main
Rd. façade of the building by eliminating a door and
stairway on the rear of the building and providing two
handicapped accessible doors on the north side of the building
facing East Main Road.
The Board reviewed the revised plan. The
Board requested clarification that the proposed windows will be
double-hung and with the appearance of divided-light windows,
as was required on the approved plan. The applicant stated that
such requirements will be adhered to.
Motion by Ms.
Rearick, seconded by Mr. Lawrence to approve the revised plan
as presented and dated 10/3/02 provided that the windows be
consistent with those required for the previously approved
plan, including that they be double-hung windows with the
appearance of being divided-light windows. Vote: 7-0-0.
4. Ms Bennett
stated that at the last meeting the Planning Board requested
that Mr. Wolanski contact Mr. Greifendorf, the architectural
advisor to the Town Center Review Board, to determine if he is
interested in continuing in that role. Mr. Wolanski stated that
he had sent a letter to Mr. Greifendorf, but had not received a
reply. An earlier phone message was not returned.
Motion by Mr.
Tucker, seconded by Ms. Rearick to send a letter to the Town
Council requesting that a new architectural advisor be
appointed. Vote: 7-0-0.
Motion by Mr.
Weber, seconded by Ms. Rearick, to adjourn. Vote: 7-0-0.
Meeting adjourned at 8:15pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|