|
|
||
|
Library board chairman says facts aren't
out
Newport Daily News online 12/6/06
By Matt Sheley/Daily News staff
The board of trustees for the Middletown
Public Library isn't going anywhere - at least for now.
Board chairman John W. Grisham said
Tuesday that the Town Council didn't have all the facts when it
voted Monday night to ask members of the volunteer board to
resign, calling the action "misinformed and completely
unnecessary."
"I'm disappointed and never
imagined they would do such a thing without the facts,"
Grisham said. "A lot of the accusations out there are
based on false information."
For example, Grisham said one of the main
factors cited in the controversy over former Library Director
Robert L. Balliot - who resigned last week - was his decision
to add a link to the grassroots group Middletown First on the
library's Web site. But Grisham said that was never an issue.
"No one on the board ever restricted
anyone from accessing that site," he said. "It's
easily accessible and always has been. It's still there and
will remain there."
But Grisham couldn't shed much more light
on the situation, saying that because it is a personnel issue,
what can and can't be released publicly still is being sorted
out.
"I expect a formal response from the
board will be forthcoming," Grisham said. "Right now,
people are only getting part of the picture."
The library board of trustees is expected
to discuss the Town Council's request at its next regular
meeting, scheduled for Monday, Dec. 11, at 6 p.m. at the
library, 700 West Main Road.
Town Council President Paul M. Rodrigues
agreed that town officials may not have had all the information
before issuing their request, but that's not what the situation
was about.
"They turned their back on the
people of Middletown," Rodrigues said of the board of
trustees. "They said fences have to be mended, but
frankly, I don't think they can be.
"The whole situation is a reflection
on us and it should have been worked out. We lost a very
valuable employee and no one really knows why. They turned
their backs on the public and didn't treat them fairly at all
and we can't tolerate that."
More than 50 people attended the board of
trustees' meeting last Thursday, during which Balliot announced
his resignation after a closed-door session that lasted more
than two hours.
Balliot has said he can't comment on his
resignation and Grisham and other board members said he left of
his own volition. All parties have declined to comment on
whether Balliot was given a buyout as part of an agreement to
step down.
In recent months - and more so in the
past couple of weeks - library patrons said Balliot was being
forced out for standing up to the board on issues like the Web
site, free speech, public information and other policies.
For example, supporters asked why
Balliot, whose reaffirmed review in October gave stellar marks
in 10 out of 11 categories, would walk away from the job. Since
his departure, assistant library director Barbara Camadeco has
been leading the library.
As of closing time at Town Hall on
Tuesday, no one on the library board had submitted a
resignation to the town clerk's office. Earlier in the day,
letters were being typed up to mail to trustees regarding the
council's request.
On Monday night, the Town Council did
accept the unrelated resignation of board member Beverly
Murphy, who cited changing work and personal commitments in her
Nov. 7 letter as the reasons for stepping down. No one from the
library board was present at the council meeting.
Even if he and his fellow trustees were
inclined to step down, Grisham said it would be impossible now,
given all the work facing the seven-member board, particularly
budget issues and the search for a new director.
But Rodrigues said he doesn't expect the
council to reconsider its decision. Councilman Edward J.
Silveira Jr. - the council's former liaison to the library
board - was the lone member to vote against the request.
State and local rules governing the
library give the council the authority to appoint trustees, but
no power to regulate the board or remove members.
"I respect (Grisham's) opinion, but
the damage has been done," Rodrigues said. "Like the
woman said during our meeting, who's going to want to come in
and work under those circumstances? We're not trying to make
this any worse, but this is the right thing to do. Someone lost
their job because of this."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|